Agentic AI Development

We build production AI agents: tool use, multi-agent orchestration, state management, evals, observability. Agents that actually finish the task.

Why we picked this stack

Agents are how LLM applications evolve beyond simple chat. Most agent products don't fail because of model quality; they fail because of state management. We've shipped agentic systems with real observability, so we know what breaks in production. We treat agents like distributed systems: idempotency, retries, partial failure, and audit trails are designed in from day one, not bolted on after the demo.

What we build with it

Single-agent systems with tool use

Function calling and structured outputs, with scoped tools and reliable exit criteria.

Multi-agent orchestration

Planner / worker / critic patterns coordinated with LangGraph or custom orchestration.

Agent state management

Memory, context-window management, and checkpointing for resumable, long-running tasks.

Tool integration layers

Custom tool definitions, input validation, and error handling around every external call.

Agent observability

Langfuse, Helicone, and custom logging: full traces of what the agent did and why.

Eval harnesses for agent behavior

Regression tests on critical paths and A/B testing of new agent versions against control.

Server racks in a data centre

The technology is the starting point, not the pitch

Versions and libraries we use

  • OpenAI Assistants APIFunction calling, structured outputs, and the Assistants tool loop.
  • Anthropic ClaudeTool use and computer use for agents that operate real interfaces.
  • LangGraphOur default for stateful, multi-agent flows: explicit graphs over implicit chains.
  • CrewAI, AutoGenUsed selectively: we lean toward LangGraph or custom orchestration for production.
  • Pydantic AIEmerging: type-safe agents with validated inputs and outputs.
  • LangfuseAgent observability: traces, evals, and production logging.
  • Custom orchestration over LangChainProduction-grade control flow when off-the-shelf agent frameworks fall short.

Anti-patterns we avoid

  • Agents with no error recovery

    Production agents fail mid-task. Plan for retries, partial failure, and graceful exits.

  • Skipping evals

    Agent behavior drifts as prompts and models change. You need regression tests.

  • Unscoped tool access

    Letting an agent call any tool is a security and cost risk. Scope permissions per agent.

  • Token-blind multi-agent systems

    Cost spirals fast when agents talk to agents. Budget tokens per run and route models.

  • Agents where a function call works

    Don't replace deterministic code with an agent. A plain function is cheaper and reliable.

Hire senior agent engineers

Need to extend your team with engineers who have shipped production agents? We embed senior AI engineers who treat agents like distributed systems: state-aware, eval-driven, and cost-aware from day one.

Explore staff augmentation

Frequently asked questions

  • Function calling is single-shot. Agents loop until the task is complete: they need state, error handling, and explicit exit criteria.

Code detail on a screen

Production engineering

The technology is the starting point, not the deliverable

We select tools for the problem, not for the portfolio. Every technology detail page on this site describes a stack we reach for because it ships, not because it trends.

Building an agentic product? Schedule a meeting.

No account managers. No discovery theatre. A direct conversation about your agent architecture and what it takes to ship it to production.